Beiträge zur Rechtsgeschichte Österreichs 2 / 2013 recht [durch] setzen - Making Things Legal.
Gesetzgebung und prozessuale Wirklichkeit in den europäischen Rechtstraditionen
|
Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Austrian Academy of Sciences Press
A-1011 Wien, Dr. Ignaz Seipel-Platz 2
Tel. +43-1-515 81/DW 3420, Fax +43-1-515 81/DW 3400 https://verlag.oeaw.ac.at, e-mail: verlag@oeaw.ac.at |
|
DATUM, UNTERSCHRIFT / DATE, SIGNATURE
BANK AUSTRIA CREDITANSTALT, WIEN (IBAN AT04 1100 0006 2280 0100, BIC BKAUATWW), DEUTSCHE BANK MÜNCHEN (IBAN DE16 7007 0024 0238 8270 00, BIC DEUTDEDBMUC)
|
Beiträge zur Rechtsgeschichte Österreichs 2 / 2013 recht [durch] setzen - Making Things Legal.
Gesetzgebung und prozessuale Wirklichkeit in den europäischen Rechtstraditionen
ISSN 2221-8890
Print Edition ISSN 2224-4905 Online Edition ISBN 978-3-7001-7595-7 Print Edition ISBN 978-3-7001-7616-9 Online Edition
doi:10.1553/BRGOE2013-2
Beiträge zur Rechtsgeschichte Österreichs 2013/2 2013, 618 Seiten, 29,7x21cm, broschiert € 59,00
Emanuel van Dongen
S. 601 - 610 doi:10.1553/BRGOE2013-2s601 Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
Abstract: This article presents the different solutions provided by various statutes, case law and legal doctrine on the subject of contributory negligence in the event of a collision of ships. With regard to collision cases in Roman-Dutch law, there were various views on the legal solution in cases where two ships collided and both captains had acted negligently. The Hoge Raad decided that where it was not clear who had acted negligently, or where the negligence was equal on both sides, the damage had to be regarded as common and both should bear the damage equally. This decision obviously contrasts with that advanced by Roman law. The Roman approach was adopted as a basis by legal doctrine scholars such as Van Bijnkershoek, and later Van der Keessel, who argued that each should bear his own loss. Interestingly, this view was supported by two local statutes. The article ends with a discussion on another situation, namely that of a stationary ship being hit by a sailing ship. Van der Keessel considered the fault of the sailing ship as more serious and therefore argued that the fault of the (captain of the) sailing ship could not be compensated by the fault of the stationary ship. Thereby he introduced a renewed application of the medieval culpae compensatio doctrine. Published Online: 2014/01/30 10:00:27 Object Identifier: 0xc1aa5576 0x002f9571 Rights: .
Virginia AMOROSI (Neapel)
Migration, Labour and Legal Discourse in the early 20th Century
A French-Italian Example in the Making of International Labour Law …
|
Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Austrian Academy of Sciences Press
A-1011 Wien, Dr. Ignaz Seipel-Platz 2
Tel. +43-1-515 81/DW 3420, Fax +43-1-515 81/DW 3400 https://verlag.oeaw.ac.at, e-mail: verlag@oeaw.ac.at |