![]() |
![]() |
ETNA - Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis
|
![]() |
Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Austrian Academy of Sciences Press
A-1011 Wien, Dr. Ignaz Seipel-Platz 2
Tel. +43-1-515 81/DW 3420, Fax +43-1-515 81/DW 3400 https://verlag.oeaw.ac.at, e-mail: verlag@oeaw.ac.at |
![]() |
|
DATUM, UNTERSCHRIFT / DATE, SIGNATURE
BANK AUSTRIA CREDITANSTALT, WIEN (IBAN AT04 1100 0006 2280 0100, BIC BKAUATWW), DEUTSCHE BANK MÜNCHEN (IBAN DE16 7007 0024 0238 8270 00, BIC DEUTDEDBMUC)
|
ETNA - Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis, pp. 216-241, 2022/11/25
The choice of a suitable regularization parameter is an important part of most regularization methods for inverse problems. In the absence of reliable estimates of the noise level, heuristic parameter choice rules can be used to accomplish this task. While they are already fairly well understood and tested in the case of linear problems, not much is known about their behaviour for nonlinear problems and even less in the respective case of iterative regularization. Hence, in this paper, we numerically study the performance of some of these rules when used to determine a stopping index for Landweber iteration for various nonlinear inverse problems. These are chosen from different practically relevant fields such as integral equations, parameter estimation, and tomography.
Keywords: heuristic parameter choice rules, Landweber iteration, inverse and ill-posed problems, nonlinear operator equations, numerical comparison